Re: KEEPONLYALNUM for pg_trgm is not documented
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: KEEPONLYALNUM for pg_trgm is not documented |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTinuWRcMO83o+wS5gA_rkjyX8o50k4LGqqVKk70Z@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: KEEPONLYALNUM for pg_trgm is not documented (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: KEEPONLYALNUM for pg_trgm is not documented
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 3:59 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Itagaki Takahiro > <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com> wrote: >> contrib/pg_trgm in 9.1 becomes more attractive feature by index supports >> for LIKE operators, but only alphabet and numeric characters are indexed >> by default. But, we can modify KEEPONLYALNUM in the source code to >> keep all characters in n-gram words. >> >> However, the limitation and KEEPONLYALNUM are not documented in the page: >> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/pgtrgm.html >> >> An additonal documentation patches acceptable? The issues would be a FAQ for >> non-English users. I heard that pg_trgm will be one of the *killer features* >> of 9.1 in Japan, where N-gram based text search is preferred. > > +10 It's certainly not too late for doc patches. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: