Re: BYTEA / DBD::Pg change in 9.0 beta
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BYTEA / DBD::Pg change in 9.0 beta |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTinsjD4JQaVrO8qE0YuRYEUbChTjU-CQJBWo80Sj@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BYTEA / DBD::Pg change in 9.0 beta (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: BYTEA / DBD::Pg change in 9.0 beta
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com> wrote: >> >>>> given how much faster the new format is (or rather how slow the old one >>>> was) and the number of people I have seen complaining "why is bytea so >>>> slow) I would like to see it staying turned on by default. However this >>>> also depends on how quickly database driver developers can adapt. >> >> DBD::Pg is already patched, and will very likely be released before 9.0 > > How do the distros generaly deal with that? E.g. do we have to wait > for RHEL7 for it to actually show up in redhat? Yeah, that's what I'm worried about. I remember going through this with E'' quoting. It wasn't fun. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: