Re: ecmascript 5 DATESTYLE
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ecmascript 5 DATESTYLE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTinqs3DMSQOz0NDvDrfcoxDzlNzR_enc47KTMccf@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ecmascript 5 DATESTYLE (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2010/5/19 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>: > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Ben Hockey <neonstalwart@gmail.com> wrote: >> hi, >> i mistakenly had posted this to pgsql-bugs already and got a response (see >> below - edited). i'm posting here since afaik it is the way i should be >> requesting new features. my suggestion is to add a DATESTYLE format to >> match the format specified for date time strings in ecmascript 5. >> the following is from the ecmascript 5 specification >> at http://www.ecmascript.org/docs/tc39-2009-043.pdf page 168: >> >> 15.9.1.15 Date Time String Format >> >> ECMAScript defines a string interchange format for date-times based upon a >> simplification of the ISO 8601 >> >> Extended Format. The format is as follows: YYYY-MM-DDTHH:mm:ss.sssZ >> >> ecmascript 5 is the most recent specification for JavaScript and i would >> think that having a DATESTYLE format to simplify interoperability with >> JavaScript applications would be highly desirable. > > I don't object, if someone wants to write a patch. I guess the > question is whether to keep adding named formats, or try to create a > general mechanism to allow the user to specify an arbitrary format, as > we do with to_char(). > I can write patch. I am against to general solution - It can be new way for SQL injection. Regards Pavel > -- > Robert Haas > EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise Postgres Company > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: