Re: bug in SignalSomeChildren
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: bug in SignalSomeChildren |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTinotkfZ9CnJ8ruv-sc3aKhzd7g2kf_iGf9Q48Ck@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: bug in SignalSomeChildren (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: bug in SignalSomeChildren
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> I like that better actually ... one less thing for developers to get wrong. > >> The attached patch appears to work correctly on MacOS X. I did check, >> BTW: getppid() in the attached process returns gdb's pid. Poor! > > Looks good to me. > >> For my own purposes, I would be just as happy to apply this only to >> master. But I wonder if anyone wants to argue for back-patching, to >> help debug existing installations? > > Given the lack of non-developer complaints, I see no need to backpatch. Well, non-developers don't tend to attach gdb very often. Alvaro mentioned a problem installation upthread, thus the question. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: