Re: refactoring comment.c
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: refactoring comment.c |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTinopr1+0J=TCfy0_biENE1mdGc4ovvoSifA8hE5@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: refactoring comment.c (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: refactoring comment.c
Re: refactoring comment.c |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > On fre, 2010-08-27 at 07:49 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> Anyway, committed. > > I suppose this is responsible for this: > > gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith > -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wendif-labels -fno-strict-aliasing > -fwrapv -g -Werror -Wno-inline -I../../../src/include -D_GNU_SOURCE > -I/usr/include/libxml2 -c -o objectaddress.o objectaddress.c -MMD -MP > -MF .deps/objectaddress.Po > cc1: warnings being treated as errors > objectaddress.c: In function ‘get_object_address’: > objectaddress.c:102: error: ‘address.objectId’ may be used uninitialized > in this function > objectaddress.c:102: error: ‘address.classId’ may be used uninitialized > in this function > make[1]: *** [objectaddress.o] Error 1 I suppose this is unhappy because it things elog(ERROR) might return? For whatever reason, I don't get this on my machine. But I'll try plugging that hole and perhaps that will fix it. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: