Re: multiset patch review
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: multiset patch review |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTinoMDfgyJTouKu-pp+qvoZvf=mBcQEVu6nndG6v@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: multiset patch review (Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: multiset patch review
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 03:04, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> I am still not in favor of adding this syntax. >>> >>> I also don't like the syntax, but unfortunately, almost all of >>> them are in the SQL standard :-(. >> >> The standard specifies this syntax for arrays, or for multisets? > > Multisets. But I chose the same function name and syntax because > arrays *are* multisets by definition. In math class, maybe. But in programming, no. Multiset is a datatype. Array is a different datatype. There is no reason why we need to clutter our parser with extra keywords to support a non-standard feature extension. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: