Re: client socket TIME_WAIT state after PQfinish
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: client socket TIME_WAIT state after PQfinish |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTinh0sM+FwWfAPPfHVu3FkAq4MWtOywqciZLcTq2@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: client socket TIME_WAIT state after PQfinish (Guillaume Du Pasquier <guillaume.dupasquier@sensometrix.ch>) |
Ответы |
Re: client socket TIME_WAIT state after PQfinish
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Guillaume Du Pasquier <guillaume.dupasquier@sensometrix.ch> wrote: > Dear Nicolas, Dear Robert, > > Thank you for your quick answers. > We do not have such behavior using SSL, how do you explain it ? > I suppose that openssl is using the setsockopt SO_LINGER that > removes this behavior. Therefore, there is a RST sent to close > the socket. > > We work with an environment that uses a lot of socket connections. > Therefore, many file descriptors are opened. If after each > Sql requests a TIME_WAIT arises we will end up with many > file descriptors opened. By default the maximum number of file descriptors > is set to 1024 and we reach that number quite fast. Hrm. Does a socket in the TIME_WAIT state count against the number of open file descriptors? Certainly, it shouldn't count against the per-process limit, as the process has already closed it. > Do you have any advices to get rid of this TIME_WAIT problem ? > Our client runs on the same machine as the postgresql server. > Would it be possible to use PF_UNIX sockets ? Yeah, actually that's the default, if you just run "psql" with no parameters. It looks for a socket in /tmp/.s.PGSQL.5432. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: