Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams
От | Thom Brown |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTinf4NneIgL4MhiWh_s-M4jTQlyncdN06vi3a60W@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-docs |
On 18 July 2010 09:36, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > On sön, 2010-07-18 at 00:46 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> Well, if we want _any_ images for the 9.0 docs, we had better decide >> soon. > > I'd be very much against putting any images into 9.0 at this time. I > was working under the assumption that this discussion would be targeting > 9.1. > > +1 Considering that these will have to become a permanent fixture, I don't expect this to be decided and working in time for 9.0. I assumed this was for 9.1 too. There are too many unresolved concerns, and one I think is important is whichever format is selected, can small changes be made to a diagram using an editor without massive changes to the file. Like Tom said, we might have some editors which will behave and just alter a piece of text we asked to be changed, and others decide it needs extra markup and rearrange the order in which things are drawn etc. And should there be a whitelist of editors known to behave which people are to use? Thom
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: