Re: Function scan/Index scan to nested loop
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Function scan/Index scan to nested loop |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTineh1Ibv34hj_Q4T1Gd5mp-MLPCqmEPNzn1QdLS@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Function scan/Index scan to nested loop ("Carlo Stonebanks" <stonec.register@sympatico.ca>) |
Ответы |
Re: Function scan/Index scan to nested loop
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Carlo Stonebanks <stonec.register@sympatico.ca> wrote: > Hello all, > > A query ran twice in succession performs VERY poorly the first time as it > iterates through the nested loop. The second time, it rips. Please see SQL, > SLOW PLAN and FAST PLAN below. This is almost always due to caching. First time the data aren't in the cache, second time they are. > I don't know why these nested loops are taking so long to execute. > " -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..42866.98 rows=77 width=18) (actual > time=126.354..26301.027 rows=9613 loops=1)" > " -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..42150.37 rows=122 width=18) (actual > time=117.369..15349.533 rows=13247 loops=1)" Your row estimates are WAY off. A nested loop might now be the best choice. Also note that some platforms add a lot of time to some parts of an explain analyze due to slow time function response. Compare the run time of the first run with and without explain analyze.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: