Re: wxWidgets 2.9 build

On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote:
> Actually, I don't see us maintaining OGL. We don't have the manpower to
> do that.
>
> I'm wondering if we really need OGL. What do we use it for? because if
> it's now out of wxWidgets and if it's an important component for us, we
> aren't probably alone. What do the other guys do? Moreover, if they got
> rid of it, it's also probably because they don't need it, meaning we
> could use something else, available in wxWidgets 2.9 that would replace
> OGL. That would be a really better way than maintaining a fork of OGL.

We use it for drawing graphical query plans, and I believe for the
query builder. Replacing it would probably not be straightforward.


--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company