Re: [HACKERS] Seeking Mentors for Funded Reviewers
| От | Richard Broersma |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Seeking Mentors for Funded Reviewers |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTinbU7WkTe6xYq7LrHoFmJYMAq4dRztkHYug3YRS@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Seeking Mentors for Funded Reviewers (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Seeking Mentors for Funded Reviewers
|
| Список | pgsql-rrreviewers |
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
So I take it that the concern is not how reviews are funded, but over the perceived connection between the organic community and third party organizations. This makes sense.
So any person regardless of association or funding is free to approach to community for assistance. In addition, third party organizations should maintain a healthy disconnection from the community.
Is this correct?
It's just that
I require both income and sleep. That's probably not an issue for
people who are just getting started in the community.
Another question is whether you really need assigned mentors at all.
...
Very few emails on -hackers go unanswered.
So I take it that the concern is not how reviews are funded, but over the perceived connection between the organic community and third party organizations. This makes sense.
So any person regardless of association or funding is free to approach to community for assistance. In addition, third party organizations should maintain a healthy disconnection from the community.
Is this correct?
--
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.
В списке pgsql-rrreviewers по дате отправления: