Re: On Scalability
От | Vincenzo Romano |
---|---|
Тема | Re: On Scalability |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTinamvPzbsLM3p9du3K8Xpqo1XCK7aA3vzAKifRX@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | On Scalability (Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo.romano@notorand.it>) |
Ответы |
Re: On Scalability
Re: On Scalability |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2010/7/29 Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>: > >> Or maybe checking against the source code and its documentation, if any. > > No, not really. What you really want to know is: what's the real > planner overhead of having dozens/hundreds of partial indexes? What's > the write overhead? There's no way you can derive that from the source > code faster than you can test it. Again, as the test would be rather killing for my group at this stage. I think that knowing whether certain parts have been implemented with linear or sub-linear (or whatever else) algorithms would give good insights about scalability. At a first glance it seems that for inheritance some bottleneck is hindering a full exploit for table partitioning. Is there anyone who knows whether those algorithms are linear or not? And of course, I agree that real tests on real data will provide the real thing. -- Vincenzo Romano at NotOrAnd Information Technologies Software Hardware Networking Training Support Security -- NON QVIETIS MARIBVS NAVTA PERITVS
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: