Re: multiset patch review
| От | Itagaki Takahiro |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: multiset patch review |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTin_xGK8V9=ik8nRDaSoxxbbyr_Y3w2cEsiaZhew@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | multiset patch review (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: multiset patch review
Re: multiset patch review Re: multiset patch review |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thank you for the review. On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 04:13, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote: > regress tests failed Fixed. > There is often used a fragment > + <----><------>fn.arg[0] = values1[n1]; > + <----><------>fn.arg[1] = values2[n2]; > + <----><------>fn.argnull[0] = false; > + <----><------>fn.argnull[1] = false; > + <----><------>fn.isnull = false; > + <----><------>r = DatumGetInt32(FunctionCallInvoke(&fn)); > it can be moved to procedure? Agreed. I use FunctionCall2() instead of the fragments. > I see only one issue. There isn't documented, what is a MULTISET? I added a short description about MULTISET and example of operators in "Arrays > 8.14.7. Multiset Support" section in the docs. Is it enough? or what kind of information do you want? Separate patches for src and doc attached. It includes a few bug fixes and cleanup. I changed the error code in trim_array() to ERRCODE_ARRAY_ELEMENT_ERROR according to the spec. -- Itagaki Takahiro
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: