Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?
| От | Gurjeet Singh |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Do we want SYNONYMS? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTinZR4D0ZFuGdCvGni=A0g-xN=kODW6s+O2ShGz=@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Do we want SYNONYMS? (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello
2010/12/7 Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>:> Your perception has been mirrored on the Oracle free list. Really whatit's question if this is task more for EnterpriseDB and less for PostgreSQL?
> PostgreSQL people need to come to grips with is whether or not we want
> to make it easier for others to port to Pg or not. (assuming
> reasonableness)
>
FWIW, EnterpriseDB Advanced Server has had the SYNONYM feature for quite a while now: http://www.enterprisedb.com/documentation/ddl-synonims.html
Regards,
--
gurjeet.singh
@ EnterpriseDB - The Enterprise Postgres Company
http://www.EnterpriseDB.com
singh.gurjeet@{ gmail | yahoo }.com
Twitter/Skype: singh_gurjeet
Mail sent from my BlackLaptop device
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: