Re: We need to log aborted autovacuums
| От | Magnus Hagander |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: We need to log aborted autovacuums |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTinY0ZjNjJrSn6gCekVrDLgdXwyB5PV=FGPv8+ET@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: We need to log aborted autovacuums (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 07:55, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: <snip> > a bit of work in userland, I don't see this even being justified as an INFO > or LOG level message. Anytime I can script a SQL-level monitor for > something that's easy to tie into Nagios or something, I greatly prefer that > to log file scraping for it anyway. +<INF-1> Log files can be very useful for details, but they suck for noticing the pattern in the first place :-) <snip> > verbosity of similar failure mode tests that follow it. Right now failure > to acquire a lock is just not considered a log-worthy issue, and I agree > that it's worth considering whether it should be. Or should it perhaps be a per-table counter in pg_stat_user_tables, given your statement above? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: