Re: Sync Rep v19

On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> +             if (walsnd->pid != 0 &&
>> +                     walsnd->sync_standby_priority > 0 &&
>> +                     (priority == 0 ||
>> +                      priority < walsnd->sync_standby_priority))
>> +             {
>> +                      priority = walsnd->sync_standby_priority;
>> +                      syncWalSnd = walsnd;
>> +             }
>>
>> According to the code, the last named standby has highest priority. But the
>> document says the opposite.
>
> Priority is a difficult word here since "1" is the highest priority. I
> deliberately avoided using the word "highest" in the code for that
> reason.
>
> The code above finds the lowest non-zero standby, which is correct as
> documented.

Hmm.. that seems to find the highest standby. And, I could confirm
that in my box. Please see the following. The priority (= 2) of
synchronous standby (its sync_state is SYNC) is higher than that (= 1)
of potential one (its sync_state is POTENTIAL).

postgres=# SHOW synchronous_standby_names ;synchronous_standby_names
---------------------------one, two
(1 row)

postgres=# SELECT application_name, state, sync_priority, sync_state
FROM pg_stat_replication;application_name |   state   | sync_priority | sync_state
------------------+-----------+---------------+------------one              | STREAMING |             1 | POTENTIALtwo
           | STREAMING |             2 | SYNC 
(2 rows)

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center