Re: PG_DUMP very slow because of STDOUT ??
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PG_DUMP very slow because of STDOUT ?? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTinWYGQqwKzBKE6F6Uf3IrBl3IBvWVPJKmDawDEr@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PG_DUMP very slow because of STDOUT ?? (Andras Fabian <Fabian@atrada.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: PG_DUMP very slow because of STDOUT ??
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Andras Fabian <Fabian@atrada.net> wrote: > This STDOU issue gets even weirder. Now I have set up our two new servers (identical hw/sw) as I would have needed to doso anyways. After having PG running, I also set up the same test scenario as I have it on our problematic servers, andstarted the COPY-to-STDOUT experiment. And you know what? Both new servers are performing well. No hanging, and the 3GByte test dump was written in around 3 minutes (as expected). To make things even more complicated ... I went back to ourproduction servers. Now, the first one - which I froze up with oprofile this morning and needed a REBOOT - is performingwell too! It needed 3 minutes for the test case ... WTF? BUT, the second production server, which did not havea reboot, is still behaving badly. I'm gonna take a scientific wild-assed guess that your machine was rebuilding RAID arrays when you started out, and you had massive IO contention underneath the OS level resulting in such a slow down. Note that you mentioned ~5% IO Wait. That's actually fairly high if you've got 8 to 16 cores or something like that. It's much better to use iostat -xd 60 or something like that and look for IO Utilization at the end of the lines. Again, just a guess.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: