Re: postgresql cluster on SAN
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgresql cluster on SAN |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTinV+hX5moXd0c-ML+G9jyjzLGtHf92Y03AKC4M6@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgresql cluster on SAN (Lazaro Ruben Garcia Martinez <lgarciam@estudiantes.uci.cu>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Lazaro Ruben Garcia Martinez <lgarciam@estudiantes.uci.cu> wrote: > Thank you very much for your answer, In the cluster that i said before I > need only failover. > In the documentation of postgresql I read about the Shared Disk Failover, > this tecnique avoids synchronization overhead by having only one copy of the > database. It uses a single disk array that is shared by multiple servers. If > the main database server fails, the standby server is able to mount and > start the database as though it was recovering from a database crash. This > allows rapid failover with no data loss. One disadvantage is that the > standby server should never access the shared storage while the primary > server is running. > > For these resons is posible to use a SAN? Yes, however, a SAN is not a replacement for some kind of streaming replication in case you need to recover a database to a previous uncorrupted state or should the SAN fail in some catastrophic way. You need to look up "fencing" for your servers. -- To understand recursion, one must first understand recursion.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: