On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 3:12 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> There's a comment that looks related to this issue in syncrep.c. It reads:
>
> /*
> * We don't receive SIGHUPs at this point, so resetting
> * synchronous_standby_names has no effect on waiters.
> */
>
> It's unclear to me what this actually means. Is there some reason we
> CAN'T receive SIGHUPs at that point, or have we just chosen not to
> (for unexplained reasons)?
Not sure. Simon?
It seems harmless to receive SIGHUP at that point.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center