Re: array_agg() NULL Handling
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: array_agg() NULL Handling |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTinQbAptPRsfO8KED2kxpZN=ePNw30AMxLRm14DS@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | array_agg() NULL Handling ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: array_agg() NULL Handling
Re: array_agg() NULL Handling |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2010/9/1 David E. Wheeler <david@kineticode.com>: > The aggregate docs say: > >> The first form of aggregate expression invokes the aggregate across all input rows for which the given expression(s) yieldnon-null values. (Actually, it is up to the aggregate function whether to ignore null values or not — but all the standardones do.) > > -- http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/sql-expressions.html#SYNTAX-AGGREGATES > > That, however, is not true of array_agg(): > > try=# CREATE TABLE foo(id int); > CREATE TABLE > try=# INSERT INTO foo values(1), (2), (NULL), (3); > INSERT 0 4 > try=# select array_agg(id) from foo; > array_agg > ────────────── > {1,2,NULL,3} > (1 row) > > So are the docs right, or is array_agg() right? Docs is wrong :) I like current implementation. You can remove a NULLs from aggregation very simply, but different direction isn't possible Regards Pavel Stehule > > Best, > > David > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: