Re: difference on execution time between prepared statement in pgAdmin and through JDBC Stack
От | Maciek Sakrejda |
---|---|
Тема | Re: difference on execution time between prepared statement in pgAdmin and through JDBC Stack |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTinQ1C0nuBcp40UFaqJJ30EnZcGyy6RO2XFtFozW@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | difference on execution time between prepared statement in pgAdmin and through JDBC Stack (Lars Feistner <feistner@justis.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: difference on execution time between prepared statement in
pgAdmin and through JDBC Stack
Re: difference on execution time between prepared statement in pgAdmin and through JDBC Stack |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
A named prepared statement (which you seem to be using through pgAdmin) is *not* the same thing as a PreparedStatement in JDBC. Most pertinently, JDBC is using an unnamed portal to execute the query, which delays planning until the parameters are provided. I don't think this ever happens with a named prepared statement (it would help if you provided server-side logs for the pgAdmin execution as well). The deferred planning behavior typically works to your advantage, but you may have run into some edge case here. Alternately, because the unnamed portal execution actually also does the planning, I presume it's counted in the time of the statement execution, whereas in the pgAdmin case, it looks like you're only timing the execute, which is going against an already-planned (at prepare time) query, so you may be comparing apples to oranges. --- Maciek Sakrejda | System Architect | Truviso 1065 E. Hillsdale Blvd., Suite 215 Foster City, CA 94404 (650) 242-3500 Main www.truviso.com
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: