Re: SQL/MED - file_fdw
От | Itagaki Takahiro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SQL/MED - file_fdw |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTinK_YfNFQzcx_v8mhycwU-cGYThg2f9zzCgV5t8@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SQL/MED - file_fdw (Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: SQL/MED - file_fdw
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 21:32, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 20:14, Shigeru HANADA <hanada@metrosystems.co.jp> wrote: >> Attached is the revised version of file_fdw patch. This patch is >> based on Itagaki-san's copy_export-20101220.diff patch. > > #1. Don't you have per-tuple memory leak? I added GetCopyExecutorState() > because the caller needs to reset the per-tuple context periodically. Sorry, I found there are no memory leak here. The related comment is: [execnodes.h]* CurrentMemoryContext should be set to ecxt_per_tuple_memory before* calling ExecEvalExpr() --- see ExecEvalExprSwitchContext(). I guess CurrentMemoryContext in Iterate callback a per-tuple context. So, we don't have to xport cstate->estate via GetCopyExecutorState(). > Or, if you eventually make a HeapTuple from values and nulls arrays, ExecStoreVirtualTuple() seems to be better than the combination of heap_form_tuple() and ExecStoreTuple() for the purpose. Could you try to use slot->tts_values and slot->tts_isnull for NextCopyFrom() directly? -- Itagaki Takahiro
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: