Re: Running PostgreSQL as fast as possible no matter the consequences
От | Jeff Janes |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Running PostgreSQL as fast as possible no matter the consequences |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTinHOnp3LUFF7JB0nnpezSFp1M8kKN+i9PpaFwV+@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Running PostgreSQL as fast as possible no matter the consequences (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Running PostgreSQL as fast as possible no
matter the consequences
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: >> > ? ? ? ?http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/non-durability.html >> >> This sentence looks to me like it should be removed, or perhaps clarified: >> >> This does affect database crash transaction durability. > > Uh, doesn't it affect database crash transaction durability? I have > applied the attached patch to clarify things. Thanks. I think the point that was trying to be made there was that the other parameters only lose and corrupt data when the machine crashes. Synchronous commit turned off will lose data on a mere postgresql server crash, it doesn't require a machine-level crash to cause data loss. Indeed, the currently committed doc is quite misleading. " The following are configuration changes you can make to improve performance in such cases; they do not invalidate commit guarantees related to database crashes, only abrupt operating system stoppage, except as mentioned below" We've now removed the thing being mentioned below, but did not remove the promise we would be mentioning those things. Cheers, Jeff
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: