Re: Linux Filesystems again - Ubuntu this time
От | Whit Armstrong |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Linux Filesystems again - Ubuntu this time |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTinF-bTnKM4=1hLE_hWAn4vWphT+Lse7cd2tRUCV@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Linux Filesystems again - Ubuntu this time ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
Ответы |
Re: Linux Filesystems again - Ubuntu this time
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Kevin, While we're on the topic, do you also diable fsync? We use xfs with battery-backed raid as well. We have had no issues with xfs. I'm curious whether anyone can comment on his experience (good or bad) using xfs/battery-backed-cache/fsync=off. Thanks, Whit On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote: > Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz> wrote: > >> Also xfs has seen quite a bit of development in these later >> kernels, any thoughts on that? > > We've been using xfs for a few years now with good performance and > no problems other than needing to disable write barriers to get good > performance out of our battery-backed RAID adapter. > > -Kevin > > -- > Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: