Re: About tapes
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: About tapes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTinEkolhYvV2jE2FSS6abmHP7o5Bv5VOuoLIRXRL@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: About tapes ("mac_man2005@hotmail.it" <mac_man2005@hotmail.it>) |
Ответы |
Re: About tapes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 4:57 AM, mac_man2005@hotmail.it <mac_man2005@hotmail.it> wrote: > Tom, Robert, > thank you. > > Now it is clearer how space on tapes is recycled. > > I tried to follow Robert's example but storing one tape per separate file. > Read in the first block of each run (hosted by separate tapes and so by > separate files) and output them into extra storage, wherever this extra > storage is. > Again, those first input blocks are now garbage: is it correct? Yes. > In this case, what happens when trying to recycle those garbage blocks by > hosting the result of merging the second block of each run? You just overwrite them with the new data. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: