Re: Extensible executor nodes for preparation of SQL/MED
| От | Itagaki Takahiro |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Extensible executor nodes for preparation of SQL/MED |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTinD-SJ5iou0Ap6SKWdP9W+sPzeXhjuDWM+Rawuj@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Extensible executor nodes for preparation of SQL/MED (Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Extensible executor nodes for preparation of SQL/MED
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:51, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 03:36, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> I am of the opinion that a run-time-extensible set of plan node types >>> is merest fantasy. We will never have that, so putting in place 5% >>> of the infrastructure for it is a waste of time and notational >>> complexity. >> >> I think I agree; and moreover there's been no compelling argument made >> why we would need that for SQL/MED anyway. > > I see. I'll cut useless parts from my patch. I tested simplified version, but I cannot see measurable performance improvement at this time. So, I'll turn down the whole proposal to use function pointer calls. I'm sorry for all the fuss. -- Itagaki Takahiro
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: