Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion
| От | Magnus Hagander |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTinB7YEcP7ubUJENaMrPgaPmL4hq=7wis+x0uM3b@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion
Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 20:32, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I wrote: >> Something in the rsync process thinks that ignoring subdirectories >> named "core" is a good idea. I'm a bit surprised nobody ever noticed >> these were missing from anoncvs before ... > > That's because they aren't. It's the -C switch in your rsync call > that's at fault. (And this demonstrates why comparing against checkouts > from the same CVS repo isn't an end-to-end test :-() Yeah, I noticed that too. Re-running now. FWIW, I got thecommand off the wiki's recommendations for how to use rsync.... -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: