Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: hstore ==> and deprecate => |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTinAfxpP4Q0btNy6sWSQJf2br3jOEjmeKE2lZAiL@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | hstore ==> and deprecate => (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>
Re: hstore ==> and deprecate => |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net> wrote: > On Jun 8, 2010, at 15:38 , Robert Haas wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> wrote: >>> hm. any chance of a shorter operator, like '#'? I kinda agree that >>> hstore_in and the operator don't have to be the same, but requiring >>> three letter token for the two most high traffic operations w/hstore >>> seems off to me. >>> >>> # is currently used for bitwise xor/geo >> >> I'm happy to do whatever the consensus is. I thought it would be >> easier to remember if the two operators were spelled at least somewhat >> similarly, but I just work here. > > Perhaps > -> That's already in use to mean something else. > Would a colon work? Nope. ERROR: syntax error at or near ":" > (That's enough bikeshedding for me.) Test first, then post? :-) -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: