Re: Synchronous standby
От | Jaime Casanova |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Synchronous standby |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTin=V0jYszMeUPRCfpYHZOZinGonpR1Au9gfe3m3@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Synchronous standby (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Synchronous standby
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 3:49 AM, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org> wrote: > In 9.1, we will be able to have synchrnous replication. Also we have > one standby server chosen by primary to be the synchronous standby > (still I'm not sure this is correct or not as stated in another mail). > yes, it is. a list of possible synch standbys and one of them chosen to be the one > Is there anyway to know which is the synchronous standby? IMO this is > important for users because that one is likely the least behind to > primary and will be chosen to promoto in case of primary dying in most > cases. i guess, we can put a new column in pg_stat_replication stating the type of the replication (synch or asynch). but that is surely a different patch... -- Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: