Re: knngist - 0.8
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: knngist - 0.8 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTin9iiQ2CPYo3PkSuGN8B7WL_kAPAJ0GUWnEOME_@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: knngist - 0.8 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: knngist - 0.8
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: >>>> Since no one has stepped up to fix these issues, I have marked this >>>> patch Returned with Feedback. > >>> This is just contrib/btree_GIST, yes? > >> Yes, core KNN was committed by Tom during the November CommitFest. > > Right. However, it's disappointing that this isn't in, because the > number of use cases for KNN-gist in core isn't very large. We really > need support for KNN in btree_gist to make it useful. > > Given that it is a contrib module, I personally wouldn't object to it > getting patched later, like during alpha or beta. But somebody's got > to do the work, and I've got a dozen higher-priority problems right now. Well, we can argue about whether it's too late for 9.1 if and when a patch shows up. Right now we don't have that problem. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: