Re: refactoring comment.c
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: refactoring comment.c |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTin9Y4TkfxxJSfsnkPiH0ovJkXBVJV2Sk6UxQfco@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: refactoring comment.c (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > I understand the concept and it seems like it might work. Not too keen > on pretending a noun is a verb. That leads to erroring. > > <verb> SECURITY LABEL? verb = CREATE, ADD, ... > > Can't objects have more than one label? > > How will you set default security labels on objects? > > Where do you define labels? > > Will there be a new privilege to define this? Presumably object owners > would not be able to set that themselves, otherwise you could create an > object, add a security label to it and then use it to see other things > at that level. Uh, these are all good questions, but I think they'd be more appropriate on the thread about the security label patch, to which I linked in my previous email. Many of them have already been discussed there. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: