Re: leaky views, yet again
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: leaky views, yet again |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTin7Nr_e6yObKjUcu+SCpxHXsAAUKip0dkN6Q=Hb@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: leaky views, yet again (KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: leaky views, yet again
Re: leaky views, yet again |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2010/9/1 KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>: > Right now, it stands on a strict assumption that considers operators > implemented with built-in functions are safe; it does not have no > possibility to leak supplied arguments anywhere. > > Please note that this patch does not case about a case when > a function inside a view and a function outside a view are > distributed into same level and the later function has lower > cost value. Without making some attempt to address these two points, I don't see the point of this patch. Also, I believe we decided previously do this deoptimization only in case the user requests it with CREATE SECURITY VIEW. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: