Re: Wiki clarification
| От | Mike Ellsworth |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Wiki clarification |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTin6QPO77saXdVRxrNEYwr_OizcYy0D7jTg9BTwo@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Wiki clarification (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-www |
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 16:24, Mike Ellsworth <younicycle@gmail.com> wrote: >>> We already have such a section on the main website, I suggest we keep >>> just one. If a vendor wants a wiki, they can use their own wiki - and >>> link it from our main website. >> >> lost me on this. I think you're suggesting Vendors set up wiki >> software for one page on their own site. Instead, I think it makes >> more sense for vendors to have a link from their own site - to the PG >> wiki. Maybe I misunderstand. > > To clarify what I'm suggesting - I'm suggesting vendors set up a page > about their own product somewhere on their own site, be it a wiki or > something else. If they don't have one, on a simple google site or > even a github wiki. > > postgresql.org will then link to this from our product catalogue, > which is on the website, just like we do for other commercial > products. That way we (the project) provide equal level of visibility > for third party software, and it's entirely up to the vendor exactly > what type of information to keep on the page/wiki. > > So basically the same thing, except I think the vendor should keep > their info and postgresql link to it, rather than the other way > around. > > -- > Magnus Hagander > Me: http://www.hagander.net/ > Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ > As long as there would be room for a 120 char description, sounds great to me. -- Mike Ellsworth
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: