Re: Error code for "terminating connection due to conflict with recovery"
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Error code for "terminating connection due to conflict with recovery" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTin5MKdMZkbnz0r_LQ_a2KQSiSBVwqTzW27Ute9S@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Error code for "terminating connection due to conflict with recovery" (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Error code for "terminating connection due to
conflict with recovery"
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org> wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org> wrote: >>> While looking at the backend code, I realized that error code for >>> "terminating connection due to conflict with recovery" is >>> ERRCODE_ADMIN_SHUTDOWN. >>> >>> I thought the error code is for somewhat a human interruption, such as >>> shutdown command issued by pg_ctl. Is the usage of the error code >>> appropreate? >> >> That doesn't sound right to me. I'd have thought something in class 40. > > What about: > > 40004 CONFLICT WITH RECOVERY conflict_with_recovery We should respect the following convention, from errcodes.h: * The convention is that new error codes defined by PostgreSQL in a* class defined by the standard have a subclass valuethat begins* with 'P'. In addition, error codes defined by PostgreSQL clients* (such as ecpg) have a class value thatbegins with 'Y'. And don't forget there are three places where the new error code would need to be added. Otherwise, +1. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: