Re: warning message in standby
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: warning message in standby |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTin4ZYi2HawTzI53uJ0ER3KTR2tVewvqP1MBiUD4@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: warning message in standby (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: warning message in standby
Re: warning message in standby Re: warning message in standby |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes: >> Should I be downgrading Hot Standby breakages to LOG? That will >> certainly help high availability as well. > > If a message is being issued in a non-user-connected session, there > is basically not a lot of point in WARNING or below. It should either > be LOG, or ERROR/FATAL/PANIC (which are probably all about the same > thing in the startup process...) I think Simon's point here is the same as mine - LOG isn't too high - it's too low. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: