Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTin3N-oUUSE5QNzYpAvmzeJCynMteoWExBZZCjU9@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes: >> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >>> OK, here's a new version with several fewer bugs. > >> Since valid values for keepalives parameter are 0 and 1, its field size should >> be 1 rather than 10. > > Right ... although maybe it should be considered a boolean and not an > int at all? Well, really, all libpq parameters are just strings, at this level. The dispsize is just a hint for, I guess, things like PGadmin; it's not actually used by libpq. >> In this case, you can check the value of keepalives parameter by seeing >> conn->keepalives[0] instead of using strtol() in useKeepalives(). > > I disagree with that idea, though. The field size has nothing to do > with most of the possible sources of the variable's value ... That is my thought also. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: