Fwd: performance on new linux box
| От | Ryan Wexler |
|---|---|
| Тема | Fwd: performance on new linux box |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTin24rAdlEMpohzAVdBXuI37DPofZrpnKxiQLPgL@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | performance on new linux box (Ryan Wexler <ryan@iridiumsuite.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: performance on new linux box
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ryan Wexler <ryan@iridiumsuite.com>
Date: Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:12 AM
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] performance on new linux box
To: Craig James <craig_james@emolecules.com>
Thanks. The server is hosted, so it is a bit of a hassle to figure this stuff out, but I am having someone check.
From: Ryan Wexler <ryan@iridiumsuite.com>
Date: Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:12 AM
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] performance on new linux box
To: Craig James <craig_james@emolecules.com>
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Craig James <craig_james@emolecules.com> wrote:
On 7/8/10 9:31 AM, Ryan Wexler wrote:Make sure the battery isn't dead. Most RAID controllers drop to non-BBU speeds if they detect that the battery is faulty.Thanks a lot for all the comments. The fact that both my windows box
and the old linux box both show a massive performance improvement over
the new linux box seems to point to hardware to me. I am not sure how
to test the fsync issue, but i don't see how that could be it.
The raid card the server has in it is:
3Ware 4 Port 9650SE-4LPML RAID Card
Looking it up, it seems to indicate that it has BBU
Craig
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: