Re: warning message in standby
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: warning message in standby |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTin1PYG9-U0a8RddAZaLkweOaJVNj4heyF2m4NYV@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: warning message in standby (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: warning message in standby
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: >> Magnus Hagander wrote: >>> It means that we can't prevent people from configuring their tools to >>> ignore important warning. We can't prevent them rom ignoring ERROR or >>> FATAL either... > >> My point is that most tools are going to look at the tag first to >> determine the severity of the message, and might even have >> log_min_messages set to ignore warnings. > > Why is this discussion based on the idea that we have to cater to > incorrectly written log-filtering apps? > > The correct log level for this message is LOG. End of discussion. Why? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: