Re: TODO Alter Table Rename Constraint
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TODO Alter Table Rename Constraint |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTin0ugVkr3kp0bZ_q4vwGxMWNM9_SX8=AGR2x5mq@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: TODO Alter Table Rename Constraint (Viktor Valy <vili0121@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: TODO Alter Table Rename Constraint
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 6:32 AM, Viktor Valy <vili0121@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for your answer! > I'm not really familiar with inheritance, but I wonder how this issue > is handled in other cases, for instance renaming an index, which invokes > internal a constraint rename too. Is that relevant or is the renaming of > constraints so special? Indexes can't be inherited, so the problem doesn't arise in that case. > Is there a solution for the test-cases you have posted? Or is this yet a > problem? We had a bug related to the handling of ALTER TABLE .. ADD/DROP CONSTRAINT for those test cases, which I fixed. I think we still have a similar problem with ALTER TABLE .. ADD/DROP ATTRIBUTE, which I haven't fixed because it's hard and I haven't had time, and no one seems to care that much. My point was just that whatever patch you come up with for ALTER TABLE .. RENAME CONSTRAINT should probably be tested against those cases to see if it behaves correctly. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: