Re: exposing COPY API
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: exposing COPY API |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTin0__cXY-uqjLQuFauuSuEZxGV7UC1EzGPTzWjw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: exposing COPY API (Shigeru HANADA <hanada@metrosystems.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: exposing COPY API
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:42 AM, Shigeru HANADA <hanada@metrosystems.co.jp> wrote: > On Tue, 8 Feb 2011 17:49:09 +0900 > Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 09:38, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: >> > Here is a patch against the latest revision of file_fdw to exercise this >> > API. It includes some regression tests, and I think apart from one or two >> > small details plus a requirement for documentation, is complete. >> >> The patch contains a few fixes for typo in the original patch. >> Hanada-san, could you take them into the core file_fdw patch? > > Thanks, I've applied to my local repo. > > s/Centinel/Sentinel/ > s/Vaidate/Validate/ > s/reaind/reading/ > > Recent file_fdw is available here: > http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=users/hanada/postgres.git;a=summary > > I'll submit revised file_fdw patch after removing IsForeignTable() > catalog lookup along Heikki's proposal. So I'm a bit confused. I don't see the actual copy API change patch anywhere here. Are we close to getting something committed there? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: