Re: Help with User-defined function in PostgreSQL with Visual C++
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Help with User-defined function in PostgreSQL with Visual C++ |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTin-t=QKaFokoig7ufb_2JGRGB2XNzh7BkNBnry4@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Help with User-defined function in PostgreSQL with Visual C++ (Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Help with User-defined function in PostgreSQL with
Visual C++
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Since we have PGDLLEXPORT in 9.0, we can mark some of exported >>> functions with it in tutorial codes and maybe contrib modules. >> >> If that (a) works and (b) reduces user confusion, +1 from me. We've >> gotten this question a few times lately. > > If we do so, many PGDLLEXPORT will be added: > * 17 in src/tutorial > * 507 in contrib > for each exported PGFunction, _PG_init, and _PG_fini. > > Any objections? Am I missing something? Oh - I didn't realize this meant marking lots of things in contrib that didn't otherwise need to be marked. Why do other people need this if we don't? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: