Re: SQL/MED - core functionality
| От | Itagaki Takahiro |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: SQL/MED - core functionality |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTimxcoJxbvE0jxMYVdzg0Qb-=smN8CP3qY0k8MPP@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: SQL/MED - core functionality (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: SQL/MED - core functionality
Re: SQL/MED - core functionality |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 23:45, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> We need RULEs or INSTEAD OF TRIGGERs to support updatable foreign tables. > > We do? Why can't the support for updating foreign tables be built-in > rather than trigger-based? Do we have any concrete idea for the built-in update feature? There are no definitions in the SQL standard about interface for updates. So, I think RULE and TRIGGER are the best solution for now. In addition, even if we support some kinds of built-in update feature, I still think RULE and TRIGGER are useful, for example, logging purpose. -- Itagaki Takahiro
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: