Re: Spread checkpoint sync
От | Cédric Villemain |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Spread checkpoint sync |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTimtkCUi0S9to_PHaGSztHeeBY3gxt2DZr3AhJBX@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Spread checkpoint sync (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2011/1/18 Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>: > Bruce Momjian wrote: >> >> Should we be writing until 2:30 then sleep 30 seconds and fsync at 3:00? >> > > The idea of having a dead period doing no work at all between write phase > and sync phase may have some merit. I don't have enough test data yet on > some more fundamental issues in this area to comment on whether that smaller > optimization would be valuable. It may be a worthwhile concept to throw > into the sequencing. Are we able to have some pause without strict rules like 'stop for 30 sec' ? (case : my hardware is very good and I can write 400MB/sec with no interrupt, XXX IOPS) I wonder if we are not going to have issue with "RAID firmware + BBU + linux scheduler" because we are adding 'unexpected' behavior in the middle. -- Cédric Villemain 2ndQuadrant http://2ndQuadrant.fr/ PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: