Re: wip: functions median and percentile
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: wip: functions median and percentile |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTimso=jVibBgQ6Y4gnzOkWb9miOXnhNGy_5UtGJf@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: wip: functions median and percentile (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: wip: functions median and percentile
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2010/8/19 David Fetter <david@fetter.org>: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:12:12PM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote: >> David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote: >> >> > Median may be useful, but we pretty much can't just call it >> > "median." Instead, we need to call it something like "left_median" >> > or "arithmetic_median." >> >> I think it would be reasonable, and perhaps preferable, to use just >> "median" for the semantics described in most dictionaries -- for >> example, this: >> >> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/median >> >> If you do a google search for "median" and poke around, you'll find >> many places where this is the only definition mentioned; the others >> seem to be rather infrequently used. Why not make the commone usage >> convenient? > > The reason not to is the same reason that MEDIAN doesn't appear in the > SQL standard, namely that what's common in one field is wrong in > another. I think some else. The reason can be more simple - implementation of median is significantly harder then other aggregates. I looked there and Oracle11g use "median" in common sense. Regards Pavel Stehule > > Cheers, > David. > -- > David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ > Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter > Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com > iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics > > Remember to vote! > Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: