Re: Auto ANALYZE criteria
От | Joe Miller |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Auto ANALYZE criteria |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTimqzLsA24-SED+ywHL6E=jXt_dcfu=c5=YN7XWR@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Auto ANALYZE criteria (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Auto ANALYZE criteria
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Thanks for fixing the docs, but if that's the case, I shouldn't be seeing the behavior that I'm seeing. Should I flesh out this test case a little better and file a bug? Thanks, Joe On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Joe Miller <joe.d.miller@gmail.com> writes: >> I was looking at the autovacuum documentation: >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/interactive/routine-vacuuming.html#AUTOVACUUM > >> For analyze, a similar condition is used: the threshold, defined as: >> analyze threshold = analyze base threshold + analyze scale factor * >> number of tuples >> is compared to the total number of tuples inserted or updated since >> the last ANALYZE. > >> I guess that should be updated to read "insert, updated or deleted". > > Mph. We caught the other places where the docs explain what the analyze > threshold is, but missed that one. Fixed, thanks for pointing it out. > > regards, tom lane >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: