Re: Feature request: drop rules
От | Thom Brown |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Feature request: drop rules |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTimoKrJFQqeyO37Bc354Zvvs4b9DsvaFWAyLToLs@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Feature request: drop rules (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Feature request: drop rules
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On 21 July 2010 15:46, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Thom Brown <thombrown@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 21 July 2010 14:32, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Guillaume Lelarge >>> <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: >>>> >>>> Tried it. Still works for me. I'm on Linux, but I don't think it is the >>>> issue :) >>> >>> Actually, it might be. pgRule::CanDrop() is calling schema->CanDrop(), >>> however schema actually contains the table object. I think this is >>> because rules can exist under tables and views, so originally deriving >>> them from pgTableObject seemed wrong. >>> >>> >>> -- >> >> I create a rule on a view, it comes up with the "Drop/Delete" and >> "Drop Cascaded" options. > > I've pushed a commit that should fix this (as well as some icon > improvements that I previously forgot to push). You now get the option > to drop a rule from a table or view (though not if it's "the" rule > that implements the view), and no longer get the option to create > rules on system views. > Cheers Dave :) Shame I never actually use rules myself, but I'm sure many do. ;) Thom
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: