Re: bg worker: overview
От | Jaime Casanova |
---|---|
Тема | Re: bg worker: overview |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTimn6bDE17lebsiu806rH7oWKcanXp0Jx0OuIxH7@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: bg worker: overview (Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch>) |
Ответы |
Re: bg worker: overview
Re: bg worker: overview |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch> wrote: > > However, note that the coordinator is designed to be just a message > passing or routing process, which should not do any kind of time > consuming processing. It must *coordinate* things (well, jobs) and react > promptly. Nothing else. > so, merging this with the autovacuum will drop our hopes of having a time based autovacuum? not that i'm working on that nor i was thinking on working on that... just asking to know what the implications are, and what the future improves could be if we go this route -- Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: