Re: pg_ctl failover Re: Latches, signals, and waiting

On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 10:18 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the review!
>
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> I see that the docs part of the patch removes the mentioning of
>> reporting servers - is that intentional, or a mistake? Seems that
>> usecase still remains, no?
>
> It was intentional, but I agree with you. I re-added the mention to
> the reporting servers.
>
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> Also, the patch no longer applies, since it conflicts with
>> faa0550572583f51dba25611ab0f1d1c31de559b.
>>
>> Since you (Fujii-san) wrote both of them, feel like rebasing it
>> properly for current master?
>
> Yeah, I rebased the patch to the current git master and attached it.

Committed with minor tweaks to comments and documentation.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company