Re: BYTEA / DBD::Pg change in 9.0 beta
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BYTEA / DBD::Pg change in 9.0 beta |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTimjB25eIU4KyfAyjrNbYjCzktnow9LK1BhEnWlJ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BYTEA / DBD::Pg change in 9.0 beta (Kenneth Marshall <ktm@rice.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: BYTEA / DBD::Pg change in 9.0 beta
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Kenneth Marshall <ktm@rice.edu> wrote: > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 10:54:01AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner >> <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> wrote: >> > On 05/19/2010 08:13 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> >> Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de> writes: >> >>> --On 18. Mai 2010 23:20:26 +0200 Jesper Krogh <jesper@krogh.cc> wrote: >> >>>> May I ask whats the reason is for "breaking" the compatibillity? >> >> >> >>> "Efficency", if i am allowed to call it this way. The new hex >> >>> representation should be more efficient to retrieve and to handle than the >> >>> old one. I think bytea_output was set to hex for testing purposes on the >> >>> first hand, but not sure wether there was a consensus to leave it there >> >>> finally later. >> >> >> >> Yeah, we intentionally set it that way initially to help find stuff that >> >> needs to be updated (as DBD::Pg evidently does). ?It's still TBD whether >> >> 9.0.0 will ship with that default or not. >> > >> > given how much faster the new format is (or rather how slow the old one >> > was) and the number of people I have seen complaining "why is bytea so >> > slow) I would like to see it staying turned on by default. However this >> > also depends on how quickly database driver developers can adapt. >> >> I would favor waiting a release to turn it on by default, precisely to >> give driver developers time to adapt. >> > Changing something like that within the minor release arc is > not a good idea. It would be better to have it on by default and > if the driver developers are not up to use it, they can have that > as a setting that they will need to change when going to 9.0. I > would be very upset to have a minor upgrade break my database. At > least the major upgrades have more testing. I meant, wait for the next MAJOR release to turn it on by default. Changing it in a minor release is clearly a bad idea. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: