Re: wip: functions median and percentile
От | Dean Rasheed |
---|---|
Тема | Re: wip: functions median and percentile |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTimiWJqhc+=Ysy-NeAgL136xKg3ZxgU=ZvFy3U-q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: wip: functions median and percentile (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 11 October 2010 10:55, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote: >> BTW, why has percentile been removed from this patch? As the more >> general, and SQL standard function, that would seem to be the more >> useful one to include. Upthread it was mentioned that there is already >> an ntile window function, but actually that's a completely different >> thing. > > The reason for removing was impossibility to specify so some parameter > must by immutable - in this case p parameter should be immutable > otherwise the result is undefined. > Could we not just make an arbitrary choice, like the last non-null value, and then document that. I can't believe that this would ever be an issue in practice. I don't think there is any way to deduce the following from behaviour from the documentation: select string_agg(i::text, repeat(',',i)) from generate_series(1,10) as g(i); string_agg -------------------------------------------------------------------1,,2,,,3,,,,4,,,,,5,,,,,,6,,,,,,,7,,,,,,,,8,,,,,,,,,9,,,,,,,,,,10 (1 row) but I don't see it as a real problem for the aggregate. Thoughts? Regards, Dean
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: